A probabilistic approach to solving unknown linear stochastic differential equations with Bayesian uncertainty quantification and inference

Auteurs-es

  • Collins Musera Department of Statistics and Actuarial Sciences, Maseno University, Kisumu, Kenya Auteur-e
  • Fredrick Onyango Department of Statistics and Actuarial Sciences, Maseno University, Kisumu, Kenya Auteur-e
  • David Angwenyi Department of Mathematics, Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology, Kakamega, Kenya Auteur-e https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6958-2817

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.51867/Asarev.Maths.2.1.17

Mots-clés :

Bayesian Inference, Uncertainty Quantification, Linear Systems, Probabilistic Modeling, State Estimation, Stochastic Differential Equations (SDEs)

Résumé

This work develops a probabilistic framework for solving unknown linear stochastic differential equations (SDEs) by treating the numerical solution as an inference problem. Starting from classical foundations, including the Fokker–Planck and Kushner–Stratonovich formulations, the study derives the evolution of conditional probability densities and presents both the strong and weak forms of the Kushner– Stratonovich equation. Under linear–Gaussian assumptions, the solution remains Gaussian and is fully characterized by its mean and covariance. Deterministic moment equations are derived for state transition and covariance propagation, providing a computationally tractable alternative to full sampling methods. Embracing probabilistic numerics, the framework interprets numerical solvers as inference procedures that return distributions over trajectories, thereby quantifying both process noise and discretization uncertainty. Connections are established with Bayesian probabilistic numerics, and the results demonstrate that moment-based probabilistic solvers deliver calibrated uncertainty for filtering and forecasting tasks. This approach is particularly valuable in engineering, finance, and climate modeling, where reliable uncertainty quantification is critical for decision-making under stochastic dynamics. The paper concludes by recommending robust numerical schemes for the Kushner– Stratonovich equation, comparative studies against Euler–Maruyama and Milstein methods, extensions to partially observed and real-time systems, and validation of the framework using real-world case studies.

Références

Burrage, K., & Burrage, P. M. (1996). High strong order explicit Runge-Kutta methods for stochastic ordinary differential equations. Applied Numerical Mathematics, 22, 81-101.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9274(96)00027-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9274(96)00027-X

Cockayne, J., Oates, C., Sullivan, T., & Girolami, M. (2019). Bayesian probabilistic numerical methods. SIAM Review, 61(4), 756-789. https://doi.org/10.1137/17M1139357 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1137/17M1139357

Doucet, A., de Freitas, N., & Gordon, N. J. (Eds.). (2001). Sequential Monte Carlo methods in practice. Springer.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3437-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3437-9

Hennig, P., Osborne, M., & Girolami, M. (2015). Probabilistic numerics and uncertainty in computations. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 471(2179), Article 20150142. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2015.0142 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2015.0142

Higham, D. J. (2001). An algorithmic introduction to numerical simulation of stochastic differential equations. SIAM Review, 43(3), 525-546. https://doi.org/10.1137/S0036144500378302 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1137/S0036144500378302

Jazwinski, A. H. (1970). Stochastic processes and filtering theory. Academic Press.

Julier, S. J., & Uhlmann, J. K. (2004). Unscented filtering and nonlinear estimation. Proceedings of the IEEE, 92(3), 401-422. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2003.823141 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2003.823141

Kalman, R. E., & Bucy, R. S. (1961). New results in linear filtering and prediction theory. Journal of Basic Engineering, 83(1), 95-108. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3658902 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3658902

Kersting, H., & Hennig, P. (2016). Active uncertainty calibration in Bayesian ODE solvers. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.

Kloeden, P. E., & Platen, E. (1992). Numerical solution of stochastic differential equations. Springer.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-12616-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-12616-5

Kushner, H. J. (1962). On the differential equations satisfied by conditional probability densities of Markov processes, with applications. Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Series A: Control, 2(1), 106-119. https://doi.org/10.1137/0302009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1137/0302009

Kushner, H. J. (1967). Dynamical equations for optimal nonlinear filtering. Journal of Differential Equations, 3(2), 179-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0396(67)90023-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0396(67)90023-X

Le Fay, Y., Särkkä, S., & Corenflos, A. (2025). Modelling pathwise uncertainty of stochastic differential equations samplers via probabilistic numerics. Bayesian Analysis. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1214/25-ba1522 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1214/25-BA1522

Øksendal, B. (2013). Stochastic differential equations: An introduction with applications (6th ed.). Springer.

Risken, H. (1996). The Fokker-Planck equation: Methods of solution and applications (2nd ed.). Springer.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-61544-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-61544-3

Särkkä, S., & Solin, A. (2019). Applied stochastic differential equations. Cambridge University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108186735 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108186735

Stratonovich, R. L. (1968). Conditional Markov processes. Theory of Probability and Its Applications, 13(1), 156-178. https://doi.org/10.1137/1105015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1137/1105015

Téléchargements

Publié

2025-12-27

Numéro

Rubrique

Articles

Comment citer

Musera, C., Onyango, F., & Angwenyi, D. (2025). A probabilistic approach to solving unknown linear stochastic differential equations with Bayesian uncertainty quantification and inference. African Scientific Annual Review, 2(1), 240-253. https://doi.org/10.51867/Asarev.Maths.2.1.17

##plugins.generic.shariff.share##

Articles similaires

1-10 de 26

Vous pouvez également Lancer une recherche avancée d’articles similaires à cet article.